Today I would like to look at legitimately bad design in the form of the Bugatti Veyron. Here is a thing that is utterly, completely devoid of practical use for the improvement of human life. On the contrary, because it is such a fuel guzzling, traffic inducing hog, there is nothing about this machine that justifies its existence.
Consider the achievements of this machine, it has a 1001hp or (depending on the model) 1200hp engine. Is this engine some marvel of new and novel design? No, heavens of course not, it's simply a 8L W-16 (two side-by-side V8s) with four turbo charges. In other words it's four 2L 250hp turbo charged engines that have been glued together. A marvel of cam timing, except even there, only two overhead cams, so a total of four cam shafts are required. But when you think about it, a 250hp 2L four cyclinder turbo charged engine, nothing fancy there.
Well it is true the Vayron is fast, 240km/h, except consider this, the TGV has a top speed of 320km/h and unlike the Vayron can actually sustain such a speed for prolonged periods (without a traffic citation or a blown tyre - to say nothing of the fact that there is only one oval, I know of, big enough for the Vayron to reach full speed on.)
Ah yes, but a Vayron is more direct, you have to wait for the train if you take the TGV. Well yes, but then at least the TGV only stops for scheduled passenger loading and unloading. The Vayron, well pedal to the metal will exhaust the 100L tank in 12 minutes. So really highways of the world get fleeting glances of this ludicrous machine, the Vayron's natural home is a gas station. Heck even at "normal" highway driving, it managed to suck away 18L per 100km, or 13mpg (US gallons). That means that while the 100L tank might make it a full 556km on the highway the fact is this is a function of the swollen size of the tank. A normal small car typically has a 40 or 60L tank. If we go with those numbers the 60L tank would last just 330km, and heaven knows what city driving would get.
Yes but the point of the car is speed!
Okay, conceded as a recreation for small boys and rich men with a mid-life crisis, the Veyron fills a market niche nicely. But for an engineer wishing to push the envelope, the only significant achievement in the Vayron are the $10,000 tyres. As far as I can tell the rest of the vehicle is a complete waste and in a peak oil environment, the Veyron is a criminal waste.
Thus the Veyron, for being hailed as an achievement in engineering, that it is not, for being as wasteful, more so actually, than a Ford GT (a car that won infamy on the hit BBC car review TV show Top Gear for being a gas guzzler), gets the status of second worst engineering design that I can think of!
My next post, why I believe the Space Shuttle is an example of the various worst possible design.