On Internal Combustion and Other Things

I've been thinking a lot lately about the BCC, I've no idea why, well I've gone for my first few serious (i.e. 100km+ bike rides) since the boys were born. Anyway I was talking to Dawn about the BCC, she only rode with them once but was not impressed. One guy hit on her, another, upon learning that there was to be no networking opportunities with Dawn couldn't be bothered to talk with her, I didn't learn any of this until just a few weeks ago. I find it ironic, though, the guy that hit on Dawn, well Dawn thought he was ugly. Anyway Dawn was already living with me when this happened and now she's my wife and mother of my children.

If I can just address the guy who was hitting on Dawn. Really, hitting on another guy's girlfriend is a really classy act E.M. (I'll put his initials), but hey you've never been particularly pleasant to me which pretty much explains why I detest you. The hitting on the woman I would propose to less than two months later, that was just... well frankly completely unsurprising. That seemed like the sort of thing you would do.

I guess it's a shame though, there are some great guys in that club, Thi Ng, Ian Willcox, but truth is I'm okay with riding alone, riding is already a pretty solitary activity to begin with and with infant sons I find it impossible to hit the road on any sort of schedule. (I feel guilty seeing Dawn scrambling about organizing bottles and changing diapers so I generally help out until at least one of the boys has settled.)

At least I've been able to pack in a few rides lately, as I documented earlier, slowly I'm rebuilding my base. It's remarkable how much things have fallen apart for me (from a physical abilities perspective) since the birth of the two little ones. Though of all the reasons to loose a base, well frankly twins really are a blessing, they don't have colic (knock wood or something!) they are both gaining both height and weight with a remarkable speed. They are the cutest little things... big things, and yes they've turned my life inside out and upside down and I wouldn't trade it for anything!

I remember in 2010, I was riding all the time, I'd have to look at my calendar but I suspect in August and September I was averaging about 500~1000km/week. Now I'm not doing that in a month, but I'm not lonely and the T.V. is principally a source for background noise. (Though I still try to watch the Daily Show, when John Stewart covered the RNC I couldn't stop laughing... though perhaps I should be crying?)

Anyway I was reading some of my anti-SUV posts, I feel rather ashamed of my truck, but then I remember the grief I had trying to make something more modest work. The fact is, if you've got a family with twins you're going to need a really big machine, either a mini-van or an SUV and I just cannot bring myself to buy a mini-van.

Ironic really, I remember when my brother and I were young we didn't have car seats, back seats only had two point restraint, lap belts, and there were no airbags. Now by law children under a certain size or age must sit in booster seats or full on car seats and there are regulations for car seats that make the damn things so big you need a huge vehicle if you have multiple children. Maybe that's why SUVs became so popular?

That wouldn't explain the vegan I know who bought himself a Tiguan, he's got no children. But here's a random thought on veganism, suppose Dawn or I, or both of us were vegans (praise be Bovine god of steaks were not!), but anyway suppose there was a vegan in the family would the boys be allowed to have breast milk? What about women who are unable to produce breast milk, say for medical reasons? Would they be allowed to give their children formula which is basically vitamin and mineral fortified cows milk? What if their children had say, an iron deficiency, sure they can give their kids spinach but lets face it, you need to boost your iron levels have a steak! (Well liver actually is the most concentrated iron delivery food, but it tastes so bad and steak is only marginally lower down the iron content table, go indulge, have a double porterhouse at Harbour 60, its a medical necessity!)

I've thought about the vegan a few times, you see when he rationalized his purchase of the Tiguan he used something to the effect of "that 2L Turbo engine is very efficient". No it's not, I had one, well back then it was a 1.8L Turbo in my Audi A4 years ago. Anyway I guess VW bored out the cylinders a little, but the point is, that thing was a gas guzzler for a small sedan it had appalling fuel economy. (A full seven seater Toyota RAV-4 had better fuel numbers than the five seater A4.) But I just want to point out how a remark like "2L Turbo is very efficient" reflects a lack of understanding of basic auto engine design in particular the fundamentals of what a Turbocharger is and does. Okay, I know someone's bound to ask, so here's a link to turbo's or if you know me, just ask and I can give a more non-technical explanation as to why the remark "a 2L Turbo is very efficient" is such an idiotic thing to say.

And to think I'm contemplating trading up my 2009 Q7 for a brand new supercharged 2013 Q7, (I'm fed up with being cut off in the city), I know going from a 3.6L naturally aspirated to a 3.0L Super is going to be ugly at the pumps but I can live with that, the thing that's eating me right now is how unresponsive the truck gets when I mash my foot into the firewall. Yes, I've thought about all the torque in diesel, but I'm being cut off at speed, not from stop lights. Still I wonder what ole' Carroll Shelby "there's no replacement for displacement" would say about our modern super and turbo charged engines.

I should've been a mechanical engineer sure I don't really approve of internal combustion engines (for environmental reasons) but the physics of them sure are interesting. (Yes I know it's all 19'th century technology, but hey, there were improvements made, back in the 20's, the 1920s!) Anyway can't I be interested in painfully obsolete technology?